CPM 154 steel is a premium martensitic stainless steel widely recognized in high-performance knife manufacturing, precision tooling, aerospace components, and demanding industrial applications. Produced using Crucible Particle Metallurgy (CPM) technology, CPM 154 offers an exceptional balance of wear resistance, corrosion resistance, toughness, and edge retention.
Because it is a proprietary American steel grade, many engineers, buyers, and manufacturers frequently ask: What is the equivalent of CPM 154 steel? This article provides a detailed technical overview of CPM 154, its chemical composition, mechanical properties, and the closest international equivalents across different standards.
CPM 154 is the powder metallurgy (PM) version of conventional 154CM stainless steel. It is produced using Crucible’s Particle Metallurgy process, which involves:
Atomizing molten steel into fine powder
Hot isostatic pressing (HIP) to consolidate the powder
Producing a uniform microstructure with fine carbides
Compared to conventionally melted 154CM, CPM 154 offers:
More uniform carbide distribution
Improved toughness
Enhanced grindability
Better polishability
Consistent heat treatment response
It is classified as a high-carbon, high-chromium martensitic stainless steel.
Typical chemical composition (weight %):
Carbon (C): 1.05%
Chromium (Cr): 14.0%
Molybdenum (Mo): 4.0%
Manganese (Mn): 0.5%
Silicon (Si): 0.3%
Iron (Fe): Balance
Key characteristics:
High carbon improves hardness and wear resistance
14% chromium provides strong corrosion resistance
4% molybdenum enhances pitting resistance and strength
This composition places CPM 154 between traditional stainless tool steels and modern high-vanadium super steels.
When properly heat treated, CPM 154 typically achieves:
Hardness: 58–62 HRC (commonly 60–61 HRC for knives)
Good edge retention
Excellent corrosion resistance
High polishability
Better toughness than many high-carbide steels
The powder metallurgy process refines carbide size, reducing brittleness compared to conventionally cast steels with similar composition.
Chemically, CPM 154 and 154CM are nearly identical.
The difference lies in production method:
154CM → Conventional ingot metallurgy
CPM 154 → Powder metallurgy
CPM 154 has:
Finer carbides
Improved toughness
More uniform structure
Better machining characteristics
In practical terms, CPM 154 performs slightly better than 154CM in toughness and consistency.
Because CPM 154 is a proprietary American steel, there is no exact 1:1 international equivalent. However, several grades are considered close substitutes depending on application.
The closest chemical equivalent.
Standard: ASTM A276 / A681
Type: Martensitic stainless steel
Difference:
Produced via conventional melting
Slightly less uniform microstructure
For most industrial uses, 154CM can be considered the direct equivalent.
Japanese equivalent produced by Hitachi.
Composition:
Similar carbon (~1.05%)
Chromium (~14%)
Molybdenum (~4%)
Performance:
Very similar to 154CM
Widely used in knife manufacturing
ATS-34 is often considered the Japanese counterpart to 154CM rather than CPM 154 specifically.
Standard: JIS G4303
Composition:
Carbon: ~1.1%
Chromium: ~17%
Low molybdenum
Comparison:
Higher chromium
Lower molybdenum
Lower toughness
Slightly less wear resistance
440C offers good corrosion resistance but does not match CPM 154 in wear resistance or fine microstructure.
There is no direct DIN equivalent, but the closest European grades include:
X105CrMo17 (1.4125) → Equivalent to 440C
X50CrMoV15 (1.4116) → Lower carbon, lower performance
However, neither matches CPM 154’s 4% molybdenum content.
N695 is chemically similar to 440C.
Comparison:
Higher chromium
Lower molybdenum
Good corrosion resistance
Lower wear resistance compared to CPM 154
Not a perfect substitute but used in similar applications.
If exact chemical equivalence is not required, these steels offer comparable performance:
Higher vanadium
Better wear resistance
Higher cost
Slightly different corrosion profile
More advanced but not chemically equivalent.
Contains vanadium and cobalt
Good edge retention
Strong corrosion resistance
Often used as a mid-to-high-grade alternative.
Improved corrosion resistance
Better toughness
Lower molybdenum
Used in similar knife applications but not a metallurgical equivalent.
The major difference is the high molybdenum content in CPM 154, which improves:
Pitting resistance
Strength
Wear resistance
When selecting an equivalent, consider:
Best alternatives:
154CM
ATS-34
If powder metallurgy performance is required, consider:
CPM S35VN (upgrade option)
If corrosion resistance is more important than edge retention:
440C
N695
If wear resistance and strength are critical:
154CM remains the best match
440C provides acceptable performance at lower cost
Conventional 154CM is usually cheaper than CPM 154
Typical heat treatment for CPM 154:
Austenitize: 1950–2000°F (1065–1095°C)
Quench: Air or plate quench
Cryogenic treatment (optional for maximum hardness)
Temper: 300–1000°F depending on desired hardness
Proper heat treatment is critical. Many performance differences between equivalent steels are due more to heat treatment quality than chemistry alone.
Short answer: No exact international equivalent exists for CPM 154.
Closest chemical equivalents:
154CM (USA)
ATS-34 (Japan)
Closest general stainless tool steel family:
440C (DIN 1.4125)
However, CPM 154’s powder metallurgy process gives it unique microstructural advantages that cannot be fully replicated by conventional ingot steels.
CPM 154 is a high-performance martensitic stainless steel produced using powder metallurgy, offering superior wear resistance, toughness, and corrosion resistance compared to conventional 154CM.
The closest equivalents include:
154CM (USA) – Direct chemical equivalent
ATS-34 (Japan) – Near chemical twin
440C (DIN 1.4125) – Similar stainless tool steel, but lower molybdenum
While no perfect global equivalent exists, selecting the right substitute depends on the application’s specific requirements—whether prioritizing corrosion resistance, wear resistance, toughness, or cost efficiency.
For high-end applications where microstructural uniformity and performance consistency are critical, CPM 154 remains a premium choice in the martensitic stainless steel category.